Teams

Young-Lyons - Lyons' Pride Tennis Team 40 M3.0

2025 Howard Adult 40 & Over · Howard Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#3 DoublesMario Walker / Kirk Wilkerson vs Thomas Atkins / Alexander Sacker0-6, 2-6
2025-08-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlexander Knapp / Rodney Rector vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-24vs Connor - Not My Court 40+ 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesMario Walker vs Frank Barnett4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRodney Rector / Kirk Wilkerson vs Noel Marucut / ismael tura4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRodney Rector / Raymond Lyons vs Jaspreet Singh / Sandeep Das0-6, 0-6
2025-07-12vs Toro - Net Sucess 40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMario Walker / Rodney Rector vs William Custer / Abraham Hollander6-7, 2-6
2025-06-28vs Connor - Not My Court 40+ 3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesTHOMAS AHN / Rodney Rector vs Derik Davis / Alexander Sodt6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMario Walker / Kenny Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMario Walker / Bill Keating vs Sandeep Das / Adam Drucker3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRodney Rector / Kenny Nguyen vs Thomas Atkins / Jaspreet Singh1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Rudolph Isaac
published
3.10
Greg Singh
published 3.5
3.02
Richard Brandt
published
2.91
Bill Keating
published 3
2.80
Waldo Ford
published
Alexander Knapp
published 3
2.71
Mario Walker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.45
Kirk Wilkerson
published
2.43
Rodney Rector
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.41
Raymond Lyons
published
THOMAS AHN
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Singh + Bill Keating134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
99W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Rudolph Isaac
46W–25L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Greg Singh
14W–26L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Richard Brandt
20W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Waldo Ford
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Alexander Knapp
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Mario Walker
24W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
Kirk Wilkerson
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Rodney Rector
27W–109L career · 8 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.43
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41
THOMAS AHN
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.