Teams

4 ACAC Pinsker

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-05vs 3 RCC ArmstrongWon 10
W#1 DoublesWill Benton / Mike Downey vs Andrew Wisniewski / Adam Kemp6-2, 6-2
2022-05-22vs 14 Kings Charter AnongosLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Melland / Mike Downey vs Vinh Vo / Jim Palmer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-20vs 12 Westwood Hester-MullahyLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Stamper / Mike Downey vs John Baker / Robert Teele2-6, 2-6
2022-05-01vs 8 Richmond Tennisbums 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWill Benton / Mike Downey vs Dylan Holt / Michael Bradner6-7, 4-6
2022-04-03vs 21 Burkwood CrossWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Downey / Jordan Melland vs John Dages / Scott Childs6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Glenn Pfluger
published 4
3.34
Jorge Triana
published
3.16
Jordan Melland
published
3.14
Ed Shropshire
published 3.5
2.97
Scott Rose
published
2.92
Will Benton
published
2.81
Mike Downey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Corey Winston
published 3
2.69
Vishnu Ambur
published
2.67
William Benos
published
2.52
Nicholas Boukas
published
2.40
Ion Jovin
published 2.5
Robert Stamper
published
Stephen Holahan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Glenn Pfluger
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Jorge Triana
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.34
Jordan Melland
16W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ed Shropshire
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Scott Rose
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Will Benton
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Mike Downey
28W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Corey Winston
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Vishnu Ambur
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
William Benos
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
Nicholas Boukas
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Ion Jovin
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40
Robert Stamper
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Holahan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.