Teams

WTC - Griger 7.5 Combo

2026 Dothan USTA Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 9 6:00 PM
Carie Crowley
Sep 16 6:00 PM
Kimberly GrigerJessica Deck
2026-09-02vs WTC - Crowley 7.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Kimberly Griger vs Karan Barber / Veleta Watson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Salmon / Caitlin Perry vs Carie Crowley / Jamie Shertzer6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicole Langford / Angie Mcdaniel vs Vicki Bitney / April Powell6-4, 6-1
2026-08-26vs WTC - Crowley 7.5 ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Salmon / Angie Mcdaniel vs Veleta Watson / Vicki Bitney6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJessica Kelley / Jessica Deck vs Karelia Castillo / Carie Crowley6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTC - Griger 7.5 Combo000000
2WTC - Crowley 7.5 Combo000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Natacha Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Amy Salmon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Kimberly Griger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Caitlin Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Jessica Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Angie Mcdaniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Jessica Deck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Langford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Deck + Jessica Kelley5073% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Griger + Jessica Deck404 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Griger + Jessica Kelley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natacha Phillips
134W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Amy Salmon
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Kimberly Griger
14W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Caitlin Perry
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Jessica Kelley
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Angie Mcdaniel
14W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Jessica Deck
16W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Nicole Langford
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.