Teams

IE-TCC-Jennifer Daniels

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 7.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-26vs IE-LLW-SunLakesCC-Michele WalterLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Charlotte Pereira Reisch vs Sally Schwartz / Cesaria Vazquez3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Mastroluca / Isabel Schleif vs Scipiaruth Curtis / Michele Walter4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKerri Munson / Charlotte Pereira Reisch vs Nanette Pratini / Heidi Brun6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Ruby Villanueva vs Amy Garrett / Sesilie Kay7-6, 6-4
2022-06-18vs IE-LLW-SunLakesCC-Michele WalterLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Isabel Schleif vs Jane Whitney / Kim Jensen3-6, 2-6
2022-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Daniels / Charlotte Pereira Reisch vs Jeanne Bender / Sandra Shuff6-1, 6-1
2022-05-21vs IE-CCCC-Sesilie Kay/Annette FloresLost 01
L#1 DoublesKerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca vs Laura Hibbard / Nanette Pratini4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jennifer Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Kerri Munson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Jill Mastroluca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Isabel Schleif
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerri Munson + Charlotte Pereira Reisch6550% games+9.5% vs expected
Kerri Munson + Jill Mastroluca466546% games−3.0% vs expected
Charlotte Pereira Reisch + Jill Mastroluca2443% gamesnot enough data
Kerri Munson + Jennifer Daniels5076% gamesnot enough data
Charlotte Pereira Reisch + Jennifer Daniels134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Daniels
116W–105L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Charlotte Pereira Reisch
95W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kerri Munson
129W–137L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jill Mastroluca
87W–121L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Isabel Schleif
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.