Teams

Lovelady

2025 · 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-10vs StokesWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Martinez / Darlene Powell vs Cynthia Guest / Lanette Young7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnn Carroll / Eileen Long vs Julie Stokes / Suzi Thorne6-0, 6-0
2025-12-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Martinez / Darlene Powell vs Vivian White / Samantha Watson6-3, 6-1
2025-11-13vs WilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Carroll / Eileen Long vs Debi Williams / Simone Ford6-4, 6-4
2025-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesDarlene Powell / Carol Martinez vs Julie Stokes / Kari Martin6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 NOGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Connie Corbin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Carol Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.90
Lauren Sain
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.88
Kay Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.87
Eileen Long
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Cynthia Stanfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Darlene Powell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
April Chambers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.56
Ann Carroll
published 3
2.49
Janet Lovelady
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tiffany Laird
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Corbin + Kay Henderson5157% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Sain + Kay Henderson3257% gamesnot enough data
Connie Corbin + April Chambers5066% gamesnot enough data
Carol Martinez + Cynthia Stanfield314 matchesnot enough data
Darlene Powell + Carol Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Janet Lovelady + Kay Henderson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Connie Corbin
25W–15L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Carol Martinez
35W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Lauren Sain
15W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Kay Henderson
31W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Eileen Long
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Cynthia Stanfield
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Darlene Powell
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
April Chambers
15W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janet Lovelady
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Tiffany Laird
16W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.