Teams

Me.Howard40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-13vs Me.Everitt40A4.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesUlrike Foley / Sandra Rhoades vs Sheila Riley / Lisa Scott1-4
L#2 DoublesSandra Chapman-Wilson / Angela Teasdale vs Anna Bentley / Kelsey Norris3-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Broadway / Helen Cuccaro vs Kelly Hollis / Lan Bello6-7, 4-6
2025-05-06vs Ki.Patrey40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesAngela Teasdale / Nicole Bullock vs Laura McNiven / Jane Williams3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Buyaki / Miranda Harmon vs Kimberly Patrey / Sarah Ganong6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Broadway / Emily Culbreth vs Traci Brooks / Natalie Regan7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-29vs Ti.Barrier40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Timinskas / Miranda Harmon vs Brette Best / Rachael Yelverton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Hughes / Angela Teasdale vs Anna Koltchagova / Julia Harris1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Sandra Chapman-Wilson vs Lowry Liggon / Christina Taylor0-6, 2-6
2025-04-15vs St.Luther40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Culbreth / Christin Daniels vs Molly Briggs / Dana Rawls3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Bullock / Angela Teasdale vs Kara Rectenwald / Dana Chapman4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Cuccaro / Liz Broadway vs Julia Killian / Sherrie Lefere1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Me.Everitt40A4.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesLisa Buyaki vs Megan Bennett6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMeghan Howard / Liz Broadway vs Melissa Everitt / Deno Fonville6-1, 6-2
2025-03-28vs Ki.Patrey40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Buyaki / Emily Culbreth vs Emily Childs / Jane Williams6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesUlrike Foley / Christin Daniels vs Leah Weinberger / Meghan Rider2-6, 4-6
2025-03-18vs Ti.Barrier40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Hughes / Christin Daniels vs Ashlie Adams / Rachael Yelverton6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Buyaki / Sandra Rhoades vs Lowry Liggon / Julie Kelly4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Teasdale / Nicole Bullock vs Anna Koltchagova / Stephanie Ferrell6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-04vs St.Luther40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Buyaki / Christin Daniels vs Molly Briggs / Dana Rawls2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLiz Broadway / Sandra Chapman-Wilson vs Kara Rectenwald / Karen Ice2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Christine Hughes
published 4
3.69
Angela Teasdale
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.69
Meghan Howard
published
3.69
Elise Hamilton
published
3.68
Michelle Then
published
3.66
Barbara Timinskas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Miranda Harmon
published
3.65
Lisa Buyaki
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Ulrike Foley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Nicole Bullock
published
3.48
Emily Culbreth
published
3.47
Christin Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.26
Sandra Rhoades
published
3.25
Helen Cuccaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Judith Stewart
published
3.12
Liz Broadway
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Bullock + Angela Teasdale1639% games−10.7% vs expected
Liz Broadway + Sandra Chapman-Wilson3255% gamesnot enough data
Liz Broadway + Angela Teasdale134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Hughes + Christin Daniels033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Hughes
22W–27L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Angela Teasdale
43W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Meghan Howard
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Elise Hamilton
37W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
Michelle Then
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Barbara Timinskas
80W–79L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Lisa Buyaki
145W–111L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Ulrike Foley
81W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
90W–127L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Nicole Bullock
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Emily Culbreth
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Christin Daniels
24W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Sandra Rhoades
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Helen Cuccaro
129W–198L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Judith Stewart
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Liz Broadway
86W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.