Teams

FCCC RED

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-05vs HMTC SILVERWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue vs Kristen Frisch / Amy Candlin3-1
2023-06-01vs TAG MAROONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Andrews / Janet Gugliotto vs Janet Crespin / Larea Warden2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim McConnellogue / Karen Weller vs Anna Anderle / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik6-3, 6-2
2023-05-25vs LVTA NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesDenise Andrews / Janet Gugliotto vs Dawn Hagen / Lesa Morrill-Hughes6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMelissa Basta vs Dawn Petersen2-2
2023-05-20vs CSU GOLDLost 02
L#1 DoublesHolly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue vs Alison Earnhart / Brittney Stephenson1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKARA JONES / Janet Gugliotto vs Camille Benton / Falguni Gill3-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs MLF TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesJody Wood / Kim McConnellogue vs LaRae Sehr / Shannon Ellis2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Basta vs Camy Davis0-6, 0-6
2023-04-27vs TAG MAROONLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Basta vs Wendy Saltz3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Denise Andrews
published 3.5
3.24
Janet Gugliotto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Karen Weller
published
3.13
Kim McConnellogue
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
KARA JONES
published
3.07
Holly K. Brown
published
3.04
Stefanie Haines
published
3.03
Melissa Basta
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Robyn Brady
published
2.82
Catherine Orr
published 3
Tara Leman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Gugliotto + Denise Andrews6449% games+3.6% vs expected
Kim McConnellogue + Holly K. Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Kim McConnellogue + KARA JONES033 matchesnot enough data
KARA JONES + Robyn Brady033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Andrews
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Janet Gugliotto
60W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
Karen Weller
11W–28L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Kim McConnellogue
36W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
KARA JONES
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
Holly K. Brown
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Stefanie Haines
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Melissa Basta
37W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Robyn Brady
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Catherine Orr
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Tara Leman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.