Teams

Leon - Forestmeadows - Ragsdale

2022 Leon Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-30vs NicholsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Herring / Kathy Maus vs Mary Swain / Jane Snyder2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Brenda Jahn vs Kim Meros / Bernadette Cooperman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFarida Akhavan / Denean Sykes vs Cheryl Nix / Wanda Eberhart6-4, 6-4
2022-03-26vs NicholsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGina Herring / Brenda Jahn vs Mary Swain / Melissa Jaacks1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Denean Sykes vs Catherine McRae / Lisa Franson2-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs NicholsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Susan Emmanuel vs Sharon Nicholson / Mary Swain7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Rudd / Brenda Jahn vs Catherine McRae / Lisa Franson2-6, 4-6
2022-02-19vs NicholsonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGina Herring / Brenda Jahn vs Lisa Franson / Catherine McRae2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Rudd / Farida Akhavan vs Cheryl Nix / Melissa Jaacks6-3, 6-3
2022-02-05Won 20
W#1 DoublesSandra Powell / Kathy Maus vs Teresa Sargent / Jane Snyder6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Ragsdale / Susan Emmanuel vs Danielle Galvin / Cheryl Nix6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Brenda Jahn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.32
Elaine Rudd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Denean Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathy Maus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gina Herring
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Susan Emmanuel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.87
Susan Ragsdale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Sandra Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Rudd + Gina Herring7850% games+3.9% vs expected
Susan Emmanuel + Susan Ragsdale141552% games+1.1% vs expected
Brenda Jahn + Kathy Maus231056% games−0.5% vs expected
Susan Emmanuel + Gina Herring101349% games−1.1% vs expected
Brenda Jahn + Gina Herring4353% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Maus + Gina Herring1448% gamesnot enough data
Susan Emmanuel + Elaine Rudd123 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Rudd + Brenda Jahn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda Jahn
132W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Denean Sykes
40W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Kathy Maus
109W–79L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Gina Herring
212W–283L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Susan Emmanuel
73W–86L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Susan Ragsdale
59W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.87
Sandra Powell
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.