Teams

Lincoln Red Team

2026 NE Adult 18&Over · 2.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-29vs Lincoln White TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Stanczyk / Marybeth Canning vs Jodi Zmiewski / Susanna Zach3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCaitlin Naberhaus / Sheila Foley vs Sarah Koebernick / Sierra Futterman6-2, 6-3
2026-08-22vs Lincoln White TeamLost 01
L#2 DoublesDana Rashilla / Caitlin Naberhaus vs Jodi Zmiewski / Sierra Futterman4-6, 5-7
2026-08-15vs Lincoln White TeamLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Canning / Tiphanie Wardman vs Jodi Zmiewski / Michelle Holland0-6, 6-7
2026-08-01vs Lincoln White TeamWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarybeth Canning / Caitlin Naberhaus vs Erica Heninger / Sarah Koebernick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-25vs Lincoln White TeamLost 01
L#3 DoublesDana Rashilla / Marybeth Canning vs Sheila Schrader / Larisa Andreeva4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lincoln White Team3072563
2Lincoln Red Team032715102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tammy Tegler
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.29
Caitlin Naberhaus
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Marybeth Canning
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Zachary Tegler
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Tegler
126W–156L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.83
2.5
Caitlin Naberhaus
2W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Marybeth Canning
6W–13L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Zachary Tegler
53W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.