Teams

TNT

2021 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-24vs FCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesQuentin Carter / Charlotte Rouse vs Tyler Vanvalkenburg / Telly Salafia4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Pat Gillespie vs John Goforth / Terry Sumner6-0, 6-2
2021-03-14vs Smart AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Drake / Judith Jobrack vs Matt Selwyn / Agnes Trice1-6, 4-6
2021-02-28vs FCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Pat Gillespie vs Maurice Cornejo / Cynthia Goforth6-4, 7-6
2021-02-24vs Smart AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesQuentin Carter / Erika Subkanha vs Agnes Trice / Matt Selwyn6-7, 5-7
2021-02-20vs FCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesTim Drake / Judith Jobrack vs Shane Sims / Karen Franklin6-4, 6-2
2021-01-27Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Pat Gillespie vs Miles French / Kimberly Eckhardt6-3, 6-2
2021-01-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesQuentin Carter / Benedickte Apodaca vs John Goforth / Terry Sumner6-1, 6-0
2021-01-10vs Smart AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Pat Gillespie vs Harold Bautista / Lorrie Roberts6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesQuentin Carter / Benedickte Apodaca vs Les Bullock / Ariel Selwyn6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Brooke Heiken
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.94
Quentin Carter
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.78
Owen Seely
published
3.63
Dremon Miller
published 4
3.31
Dorota Sipko
published 3.5
Erika Subkanha
published 3.5
2.73
Judith Jobrack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Linda Catullo
published
Nancy Siems
published
Pat Gillespie
published
Tang Subkanha
published
Tim Drake
published
Tracey Nankivel
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Heiken
170W–83L career · 7 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Quentin Carter
203W–66L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.94
Owen Seely
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Dremon Miller
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dorota Sipko
163W–91L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Erika Subkanha
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Judith Jobrack
72W–90L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Linda Catullo
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
2.62
Nancy Siems
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pat Gillespie
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tang Subkanha
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Drake
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracey Nankivel
4W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.