Teams

Carney: Over-Served

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-16vs Sundick/Benowitz ORCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesPamela Rulau / Theresa Johnson vs Natalie Zamansky / Traci Saliterman6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLaura Abraham vs Arlene Grodnick6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Damico / Michelle Brennan vs Lauren Sundick / Cassie Benowitz1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh vs Anne Dean / Anne Stanfield3-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesMarlys Day / Shirley Draz vs Mary Idzik / Katie York6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-09vs Puzak/Schmitt - ICTWon 32
W#1 DoublesTheresa Johnson / Pamela Rulau vs Karen Abel / Karen Lundegaard6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNancy Yost vs Deb Klein1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Abraham / Jane Hill vs Jennifer Jorgensen / Michelle Joncas6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShirley Draz / Susan Stombaugh vs Carrie Thompson / Casie Moen3-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesCatherine Carney / Karen Clark vs Heather Klein / Kim Murphy7-5, 6-1
2025-07-02vs Saturn It UpWon 32
W#1 DoublesLaura Abraham / Michelle Brennan vs Jacqueline DeVries / Joan Cahill6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJane Hill vs Angel Chandler1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Damico / Pamela Rulau vs Susan Volin / Kara McGuire6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh vs Rachel Saturn / Cindy Altendahl3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#4 DoublesKaren Clark / Shirley Draz vs Alice Douthwaite / Nancy Garrett5-7, 6-7
2025-06-25Won 10
W#4 DoublesKaren Clark / Jane Mills vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-18vs Stern: RTC LadiesLost 04
L#1 DoublesPamela Rulau / Jane Hill vs Christina Burns / Sarah Tuel4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Abraham / Michelle Brennan vs Brigitte Schiller / Kristin Lambrecht2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Stombaugh / Marlys Day vs Cindy Moe / Brenda Donelson3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesShirley Draz / Karen Clark vs Pam Bowden / Roberta Gibbons3-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs ICC 40 3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesTheresa Johnson / Pamela Rulau vs Alison James / Jaime Norling6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNancy Yost vs Christina Ticer6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Abraham / Michelle Brennan vs Jane Pirtle / Leslye Emptage6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh vs Stacy Best / Jody Aafedt4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-28vs Fjelstad/LewisWon 41
W#1 DoublesTheresa Johnson / Pamela Rulau vs Jessica Tollefson / Beth Snyder7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNancy Yost vs Amanda Herr1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Brennan / Laura Abraham vs Anne Birdsong / Andrea Thiner4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Carney / Julie Damico vs Lindsay Anthony / Brooke Anthony6-4, 7-5
W#4 DoublesMarlys Day / Shirley Draz vs Kathleen Asgrimson / Barbie Newhouse6-4, 6-4
2025-05-14vs Puzak/Schmitt - ICTSplit 22
L#1 SinglesNancy Yost vs Deb Klein7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Abraham / Marlys Day vs Kyra Schmitt / Karen Abel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Clark / Shirley Draz vs Heather Klein / Elizabeth Schmiesing0-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesCatherine Carney / Susan Stombaugh vs Jennifer Jorgensen / Carrie Thompson7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Jane Hill
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Laura Abraham
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.18
Jane Mills
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Nancy Yost
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Catherine Carney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Julie Damico
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marlys Day
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Pamela Rulau
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Shirley Draz
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Stombaugh
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Yost + Laura Abraham71343% games+0.0% vs expected
Susan Stombaugh + Catherine Carney5449% games−3.5% vs expected
Jane Hill + Julie Damico213 matchesnot enough data
Shirley Draz + Marlys Day213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Hill
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Laura Abraham
16W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
Jane Mills
105W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Nancy Yost
37W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Carney
8W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Julie Damico
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marlys Day
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Rulau
9W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shirley Draz
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Stombaugh
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.