Teams

Hills - HCC Means

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-20vs SVB Vamos - J. OrsiniWon 20
W#1 DoublesManuel Alvarez / Judi Alford vs Abigail Pellett / Shawn McGee3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Dagmar O'Rourke vs Stephen Felman / Joy Evans6-4, 6-4
2021-06-13vs HCC Ballers - A. GiangWon 20
W#2 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Dagmar O'Rourke vs Brittany Leuth / Irving Corrales6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesIgnacio Molina / Judi Alford vs Melissa Minniti / Steven Michaelis7-6, 6-1
2021-05-30vs SVB Vamos - J. OrsiniWon 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Dagmar O'Rourke vs Mike Moenter / Maki Smith6-3, 6-4
2021-05-23vs SVB Vamos - J. OrsiniWon 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Melissa Pine vs Stephen Felman / Reka Muller4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-23vs HCC Ballers - A. GiangWon 10
W#1 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Judi Alford vs Asbel Giang / Nils Corrales3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesJuliana Rocha Cardoso / Jamie Mckibban vs Akharis Sa-Ardphanchai / Sarah Summerfield Lytle3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Mckibban / Jessica Sucupira vs Rocio Frej Vitalle / Logan Hull6-2, 6-1
2021-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesIgnacio Molina / Judi Alford vs Abigail Pellett / Shawn McGee6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Gail Gibson
published 5
Connor Molina
published 5
4.46
Dagmar O'Rourke
published 4.5
4.42
Jamie Mckibban
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.42
Manuel Alvarez
published
4.40
Elizabeth Rodgers
published 4.5
4.40
Chris Canfield
published 4.5
4.37
KAREN HARKEY
published
4.36
Stephanie Means
published
4.33
Ignacio Molina
published 4.5
4.31
Judi Alford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Maria Stand
published
4.23
Stephen Lappano
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Gail Gibson
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
4.78
5
Connor Molina
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Dagmar O'Rourke
10W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Jamie Mckibban
109W–29L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
4.42
Manuel Alvarez
23W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
4.42
4.5
Elizabeth Rodgers
6W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Chris Canfield
13W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
4.40
KAREN HARKEY
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
4.37
Stephanie Means
13W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Ignacio Molina
16W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Judi Alford
89W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.31
Maria Stand
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
Stephen Lappano
0W–9L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
4.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.