Teams

FREMONT HILLS CC CM6.5A

2024 COMBO · Men 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Chris Ling
published 4
3.27
Corey Levens
published 3.5
Bob Crissman
published 3.5
3.19
Mark Kroot
published
3.16
Daniel Houlbrook
published 3.5
3.00
Wudi Zhou
published
2.88
Tim Fitzgibbon
published
2.82
Forrest Liau
published
2.79
William Schmitt
published
Alex Gyr
published 3
2.73
Seth Peck
published
2.73
Warren Yang
published
2.68
Duke Dukellis
published
Jeff Draeger
published
Mark Belinsky
published
Richard Chatwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forrest Liau + Warren Yang314 matchesnot enough data
Warren Yang + Tim Fitzgibbon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Ling
33W–25L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Corey Levens
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bob Crissman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Kroot
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.19
3.5
Daniel Houlbrook
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Wudi Zhou
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
Tim Fitzgibbon
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Forrest Liau
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
William Schmitt
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alex Gyr
0W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Seth Peck
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Warren Yang
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Alexey Kalinichenko
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Duke Dukellis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Draeger
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Belinsky
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Chatwin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.