Teams

DMurchElliot (WSRC)

2023 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-17vs TPowell (Sun City)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / Jim Northrup vs Thomas Powell / Robert Harbeck6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-10vs KKrzywosz (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / Stephen Lovelace vs Kenji Krzywosz / Mark Ciminelli6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClarke Hobson / David Bowman vs John Schlitz / Richard Givens7-6, 6-4
2023-04-03vs JMorse/CCampbell (JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Bowman / Clarke Hobson vs Alan Hamer / Charlie Henley6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChin Lin / Jim Northrup vs Jeff Morse / Greg Leblanc4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-27vs BRoork/JMorse (JCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesTerry Lewis / Jim Northrup vs Neil Burkhead / Al Abolafia6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChin Lin / Stephen Lovelace vs Peter Liapis / George Liakakos6-3, 6-0
2023-03-13vs VFitzgerald (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesChin Lin / Jim Northrup vs Bo Bobrowski / Mark Ladnier6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClarke Hobson / David Murch Elliot vs Vincent Fitzgerald / Jim Skibbens6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Allcock / Stephen Lovelace vs John-Paul Chaney / Norman Herland6-3, 6-2
2023-03-06vs GBeal/Mackie (GCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Lewis / Jim Northrup vs Howard Epstein / Al Kadar6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chin Lin
published 3.5
3.32
Jeff Allcock
published
3.08
Jim Northrup
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Clarke Hobson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Stephen Lovelace
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Walter Harfmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Northrup + Clarke Hobson3354% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Lovelace + Clarke Hobson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chin Lin
51W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
Jeff Allcock
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Jim Northrup
76W–82L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Clarke Hobson
101W–50L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Stephen Lovelace
40W–66L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
Walter Harfmann
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.