Teams

BRMST NAVY

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-19vs BRMST BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Rawsky / Doug Foster vs Renee Gracey / Daniel Gracey3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLyle Monzyk / Sarah Monzyk vs Susan Cave / Dennis Cave6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTelia Anderson / Chad Young vs Sharla Prom / Doug Prom5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2024-05-05vs RMTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Rawsky / Doug Foster vs Jen Hutman / Stuart Dimson0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTelia Anderson / Chad Young vs Keith Cecere / Lori Mason4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-28vs RCC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesLyle Monzyk / Sarah Monzyk vs Ryan Holocher / Madison Walz3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rawsky / Doug Foster vs Barbara Cole / Zeke Kirkpatrick4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDeepak APPU / Telia Anderson vs Michael Oakes / Erika Oakes6-2, 5-3
2024-04-21vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Monzyk / Lyle Monzyk vs Lindsay Thompson / Reese Brammell6-3, 6-1
2024-04-14vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDoug Foster / Melissa Rawsky vs Scott Gomer / Maggie Gomer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Monzyk / Lyle Monzyk vs Rose Foster / Dean Paxton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Telia Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Sarah Monzyk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Lyle Monzyk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Melissa Rawsky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Kelly Walter
published
2.48
Deepak APPU
published 3
2.15
Chad Young
published 2.5
Doug Foster
published
Shauna O'Brien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyle Monzyk + Sarah Monzyk221452% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Telia Anderson
34W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Sarah Monzyk
62W–32L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Lyle Monzyk
64W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Melissa Rawsky
114W–103L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.80
Kelly Walter
19W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Deepak APPU
10W–19L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Chad Young
3W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Doug Foster
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shauna O'Brien
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.