Teams

WP GREEN

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-01vs CP BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey D'Andrea / Rodrigo Segura vs Marc Costain / Mustafa Neemuchwala6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-31vs DTC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeffrey D'Andrea / Rodrigo Segura vs Philip Dankner / Paul Robbertz6-4, 6-3
2023-05-25vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesEvan Wehmeyer / Jeffrey D'Andrea vs Jeremy Behm-Meyer / Jamal Heydari3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-21vs GTC NAVYWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Matthews / Jose Amador vs John Greves / AMIT BARIK6-2, 6-3
2023-05-07vs MC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesEvan Wehmeyer / Jose Amador vs Dustin Alexander / Brent Creighton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey D'Andrea / Rodrigo Segura vs Christopher Richardson / Kevin Hahn6-2, 6-3
2023-05-04vs BP BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJose Amador / Felipe Quiroga vs Nicholas Julia / John Runnels6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Matthew Hooper
published
4.28
Jeffrey D'Andrea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.22
Evan Wehmeyer
published
4.16
Patrick Conta
published
4.14
Jace Monroe
published
4.13
Clint Jones
published 4.5
4.13
Felipe Quiroga
published
4.03
Michael Matthews
published
3.82
Andy Kim
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clint Jones + Jeffrey D'Andrea224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Matthews + Jace Monroe134 matchesnot enough data
Clint Jones + Michael Matthews213 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey D'Andrea + Jose Amador213 matchesnot enough data
Jace Monroe + Jose Amador213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hooper
38W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Jeffrey D'Andrea
58W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Evan Wehmeyer
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
Patrick Conta
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
Jace Monroe
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Clint Jones
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
4.13
Felipe Quiroga
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
Michael Matthews
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
4
Andy Kim
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.