Teams

Davis-Strings Attached-Woodlands Parks

*2025 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 NoHo Women · 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-01vs Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarol Davis / Donna Salmonsen vs Karen Fahrmeier / Risa Cogliandro6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Mazar / Lori Robertson vs Elizabeth Friend / Babette Lopez2-6, 2-6
2025-09-24vs Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Salmonsen / Dawn Brubaker vs Karen Fahrmeier / Sandy Durr7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDolores Barnhill / Carol Mazar vs Elizabeth Friend / Tami Kuykendall6-4, 6-4
2025-09-17vs Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Davis / Dawn Brubaker vs Tami Kuykendall / Sandy Durr4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Salmonsen / Carol Mazar vs Risa Cogliandro / Diane Chisam6-4, 6-4
2025-09-10vs Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarol Davis / Dawn Brubaker vs Babette Lopez / Elizabeth Friend4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Mazar / Dolores Barnhill vs Patty Matson / Diane Chisam6-3, 6-1
2025-09-03vs Fahrmeier-Young at Heart-KCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Davis / Donna Salmonsen vs Babette Lopez / Risa Cogliandro7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDolores Barnhill / Julie Pflueger vs Karen Fahrmeier / Sandy Durr2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Case / Carol Mazar vs Tami Kuykendall / Patty Matson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Donna Salmonsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Dawn Brubaker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Carol Mazar
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Dolores Barnhill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Jacquelyn Winters
published 3.5
Jeannie Case
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Pflueger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Brubaker + Donna Salmonsen6064% gamesnot enough data
Dolores Barnhill + Carol Mazar213 matchesnot enough data
Dolores Barnhill + Dawn Brubaker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Salmonsen
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Dawn Brubaker
45W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Carol Mazar
6W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dolores Barnhill
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jacquelyn Winters
5W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeannie Case
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julie Pflueger
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.