← Teams

CAC-Delplato

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Christopher Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
William DelPlato
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
—
Charles Martin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Results13 ties
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesChristopher Roemer / William DelPlato vs Michael Boggess / Jon Ellis7-6, 6-4
2019-09-28Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesChristopher Roemer / William DelPlato vs Jeff Wise / Chris Aggerholm6-4, 6-2
2019-09-27Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / Christopher Roemer vs Luis Magana / Mark Nash2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-07-13Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesScott Ackley / William DelPlato vs Yuehai Liang / Kok Waii Wong6-1, 6-2
2019-06-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTy Bettis / Christopher Shaw vs Doug Cooke / John LaBarca6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesScott Ackley / William DelPlato vs Mark Alan / Rich Brown6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWarren Olsen / Mike Olson vs Thomas Harvey / Kevin McMullen6-2, 6-1
2019-06-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTy Bettis / Christopher Shaw vs Rodrigo Martinez / Matt Savage6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMike Olson / William Maddox vs Anthony Webb / Molloy Michael6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Martin / Steve Snyder vs Rob Cresswell / Jim Boyer6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2019-06-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesScott Ackley / William DelPlato vs Frank Weiss / Brian Hefele7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRick Riley / Mike Olson vs Ron Eiseman / Fred Leonetti7-6, 6-1
2019-06-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTy Bettis / Christopher Shaw vs Steven Harrison / Bret Crawford6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesScott Ackley / William DelPlato vs Dave Sato / K Paul Smith7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCharles Martin vs Steve Elmer6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTodd Jacobson / Mike Olson vs Michael Sullivan / Jason Leong6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-05-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesTy Bettis / Christopher Shaw vs Zack Hegge / Eric Halvorson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Jacobson / Mike Olson vs Rex Smith / James Richardson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-05-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTy Bettis / Christopher Shaw vs Rick Pogue / Arkadiy Boyarshinov6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / Scott Ackley vs Vikas Rao / Douglas Bennett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMike Olson / William Maddox vs Ryan Ona / Fred Sutardjo6-4, 6-2
2019-04-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesChristopher Shaw / Rick Riley vs Zack Hegge / D Michael Jones7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTy Bettis / Mike Olson vs Jeff Kennedy / Andrew Apter6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWilliam DelPlato / Scott Ackley vs Rex Smith / James Richardson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-04-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChristopher Shaw / Ty Bettis vs Brian Hefele / MICHAEL DOHERTY6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRick Riley / William DelPlato vs Jeff Kovel / Tyler Dillavou6-3, 6-3
2019-03-16Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesWendy Vaughn / William DelPlato vs Colin Looi / Christina Bergstrom6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christopher Shaw
65W–55L career
5%93%2%
3.25
3
William DelPlato
27W–31L career
not enough data
—
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70
2.5
Charles Martin
13W–34L career · type A
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.