Teams

Olympic 3

2022 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday

23 players · average NTRP 3.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2022-01-14vs Players Club 1Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKate Jenks vs Diane MacDonald0-6, 0-6
2022-01-07vs Players Club 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Kuzma / Kate Jenks vs Christine Menke / Diane MacDonald2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Augspurger / Beth Houck vs Cheri Klisares / Leah Wagenbrenner6-7, 0-3
L#3 DoublesTraci Zavarella / Deborah Marks vs Julia Harkin / Cathleen Utgard4-6, 4-6
2021-12-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Kuzma / Liz Romagnano vs Joyce Ellerbrock / Belinda Hildebrandt6-7, 2-0, 1-0
2021-12-03vs Scarborough 2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDeborah Marks / Lara Blumberg vs Rebecca Hill / Chelsea Day4-6, 0-6
2021-11-19vs Elysium 3Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKate Jenks vs Teresa Haas5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBeth Houck / Lisette Lichtenstein vs Colleen Mathews / Monica Smith6-4, 4-2
L#3 DoublesTraci Zavarella / Liz Romagnano vs Diane Holland / Leigh Seery4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-11-12vs New AlbanyWon 20
W#2 DoublesBeth Houck / Lisette Lichtenstein vs Mary Blosser / Kay Knoll7-5, 5-3
W#2 SinglesKate Jenks vs Jill Booth7-6, 7-6
2021-11-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisette Lichtenstein / Linda Augspurger vs Anneliese Adkinson / Denisa Hiles3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKate Jenks vs Jessica Nimjee6-4, 6-4
2021-10-29vs Wickertree 3Split 11
W#1 DoublesLiz Romagnano / Kate Jenks vs Pamela Miller / Maria Ellis6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Augspurger / Sally Walsh Roberts vs Carol Seiffert / Debbie Carr3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-22vs Scarborough 3Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCathy Kuzma / Kaoru Wilson vs Mary Borchers / Meghan Reed0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKate Jenks / Laura Hollo vs Karen Meyer / Anna Thompson3-6, 4-6
2021-10-15vs Elysium 4Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLiz Romagnano / Beth Houck vs Julie Glatz / Catie Grove2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Kuzma / Traci Zavarella vs Allison Myers / Kirsten Gross3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Marks / Lara Blumberg vs Melissa Paull / Michelle Funge4-6, 3-6
2021-10-08vs Racquet Club 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisette Lichtenstein / Cathy Kuzma vs Amy Heeter / Vicky Schroer7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKate Jenks / Laura Hollo vs Joyce Ellerbrock / Molly Tyger0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-24vs Scarborough 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisette Lichtenstein / Liz Romagnano vs Sara Flinn / Heather Hunter6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Kuzma / Sally Walsh Roberts vs Marilee Hanna / Chelsea Day6-1, 7-5
2021-09-17vs Elysium 3Won 20
W#1 DoublesLiz Romagnano / Kate Jenks vs Marcia Tyack / Jill Wienke6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndrea Taglione vs Heidi Ford6-0, 6-0
2021-09-10vs New AlbanyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaoru Wilson / Liz Romagnano vs Kay Knoll / Vildan Meleca6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTraci Zavarella / Lisette Lichtenstein vs Jill Booth / Mary Blosser6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCathy Kuzma vs Mary Kusovski4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Andrea Taglione
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.54
Heather Brod
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.35
Liz Romagnano
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.29
Beth Houck
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.26
Mollie Longhouse
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Kate Jenks
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.05
TONYA LAURENT
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Kaoru Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Tiina Kekalainen
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.01
Lara Blumberg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.00
Traci Zavarella
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
2.98
Lisette Lichtenstein
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Tricia Gockstetter
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Jen Brady
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Linda Augspurger
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Michele Devine
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Cathy Kuzma
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.74
Laura Hollo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.74
Deborah Marks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Karin Zink
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Lisa Jolley
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Debbra Caughell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kim Binsky
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Zavarella + TONYA LAURENT7556% games+13.1% vs expected
Lara Blumberg + Traci Zavarella6457% games+11.7% vs expected
Michele Devine + TONYA LAURENT5753% games+9.1% vs expected
Jen Brady + Kate Jenks3255% games+8.1% vs expected
Beth Houck + Linda Augspurger3360% games+6.3% vs expected
Laura Hollo + Kate Jenks9751% games+6.2% vs expected
Mollie Longhouse + Traci Zavarella101151% games+6.1% vs expected
Lisa Jolley + Traci Zavarella3554% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Taglione
116W–48L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
3.5
Heather Brod
171W–102L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
Liz Romagnano
124W–75L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Beth Houck
216W–210L career · 13 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Mollie Longhouse
68W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Kate Jenks
65W–62L career · 9 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
TONYA LAURENT
67W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Kaoru Wilson
178W–212L career · 12 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tiina Kekalainen
95W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lara Blumberg
86W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
Traci Zavarella
135W–199L career · 12 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
Lisette Lichtenstein
40W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tricia Gockstetter
73W–77L career · 9 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
Jen Brady
33W–74L career · 5 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.89
Linda Augspurger
108W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
Michele Devine
129W–111L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Cathy Kuzma
132W–189L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Laura Hollo
67W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Deborah Marks
22W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Karin Zink
40W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.48
Lisa Jolley
121W–165L career · 7 lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.34
2.5
Debbra Caughell
48W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Binsky
59W–55L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.