Teams

SS-H RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-27vs SS-H GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Holtz / Gary Rubida vs Joel Gesink / Charles Viss4-6, 1-6
2024-08-24vs KC-RH ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Brittan / John Astle vs Malcolm Walker / Ben MacDonald6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-20vs FOX GOLDWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Astle / John Holtz vs Ben Edmonds / Ryan Heintz6-2, 6-4
2024-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Tilly / Gary Rubida vs Brian Zook / Michael Monroe6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-30vs HRCA-N ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesGary Rubida / John Brittan vs Mike Jaltuch / Erik Egtvedt1-6, 1-6
2024-07-23vs CCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Astle / Gary Rubida vs Stefan Wenger / William Taylor6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Paul Tilly
published
3.63
Tally Lawing
published 3.5
3.48
John Brittan
published
3.43
John Astle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Chris Saiz
published 3.5
3.15
Nick Staehler
published
3.07
Gary Rubida
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
John Holtz
published
3.02
Keith Bope
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Bope + John Astle131053% games+7.4% vs expected
John Astle + Gary Rubida7352% games+1.2% vs expected
John Holtz + John Astle4549% games−2.1% vs expected
Keith Bope + Nick Staehler134 matchesnot enough data
Keith Bope + Gary Rubida134 matchesnot enough data
Nick Staehler + John Astle224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Tilly
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Tally Lawing
63W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.63
John Brittan
7W–18L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
John Astle
131W–105L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Chris Saiz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Staehler
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Gary Rubida
30W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
John Holtz
6W–21L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Keith Bope
43W–72L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.