Teams

Generes/40/Div2/M/CCLA

2024 BR Tri-Level 40 & Over - Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (40&O) Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-07-17vs Braud/40/Div2/M/SOACLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Smith / Benjamin Mouton vs Jay Thomas / Scott Elston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-10vs Martin/40/Div3/M/FPLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Mathies / Madison Mulkey vs Markus Wilson / Ryan Eschete3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMax Huff / Hank Chiles vs Kelly Toups / Brook Bourgeois0-6, 3-6
2024-06-26vs Haag/40/Div2/M/UClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Smith / Kip Smith vs Michael Vincent / Jeremy Glascock2-6, 4-6
2024-06-19vs Braud/40/Div2/M/SOACLost 01
L#3 DoublesKip Smith / Benjamin Mouton vs Tyson Duplantis / Scott Elston2-6, 2-6
2024-06-12vs Martin/40/Div3/M/FPLost 02
L#2 DoublesKeith Favaro / Rusty Jenkins vs Markus Wilson / Troy Goings0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMax Huff / Hank Chiles vs Phillip Barker / Brook Bourgeois4-6, 5-7
2024-06-05vs Haag/40/Div2/M/UClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Mouton / Steven Grissom vs Ozzie Fernandez / Kenneth Aldridge1-6, 2-6
2024-05-22vs Braud/40/Div2/M/SOACSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRusty Jenkins / Pax Mogenson vs Drew Hart / Frederick Stevenson2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesBenjamin Mouton / Todd Smith vs Kenny Burns / Tyson Duplantis6-3, 6-4
2024-05-15vs Martin/40/Div2/M/ForestWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Folse / Kip Smith vs John So / Phillip Barker7-6, 6-4
2024-05-08vs Haag/40/Div2/M/UClubLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Smith / Max Huff vs Matthew Mannino / Kory Byers1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 BR (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Martin/40/Div2/M/Forest8121617218
2Haag/40/Div2/M/UClub63171024206
3Braud/40/Div2/M/SOAC45111635261
4Generes/40/Div2/M/CCLA0952244308

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Chad Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Mark Hollingsworth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Dean Davis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.44
John Ducote
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Pax Mogenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Val Generes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
James Peltier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kevin Dibenedetto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Madison Mulkey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Rusty Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Keith Favaro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
David Mathies
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kip Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Max Huff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Mark Folse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Benjamin Mouton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Hank Chiles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Steven Grissom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Dibenedetto + Pax Mogenson9262% games+19.5% vs expected
Val Generes + Pax Mogenson7264% games+16.3% vs expected
Max Huff + Kip Smith4456% games+10.8% vs expected
James Peltier + Madison Mulkey4152% games+7.0% vs expected
David Mathies + Rusty Jenkins3446% games+5.7% vs expected
Benjamin Mouton + Kip Smith2441% games+2.4% vs expected
Kevin Dibenedetto + Rusty Jenkins3349% games+1.3% vs expected
John Ducote + Dean Davis2537% games−10.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad Hamilton
48W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
Mark Hollingsworth
13W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Dean Davis
15W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
John Ducote
13W–51L career · 9 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.44
Pax Mogenson
35W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Val Generes
50W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
James Peltier
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Kevin Dibenedetto
35W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Madison Mulkey
21W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Rusty Jenkins
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Keith Favaro
10W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
3.5
David Mathies
7W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kip Smith
51W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
Max Huff
25W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Mark Folse
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Benjamin Mouton
18W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Hank Chiles
28W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Steven Grissom
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.