Teams

The Lakes/Buckalew W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-18vs Oak Creek/Jackson-Trousil W4.0TWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarge Goodman / Julia Duong vs Mary Jane Carter / Shannon Phillips6-4, 6-2
2026-06-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Deaton / Erika Meade vs Tricia Roos / Lauren Reid6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyane Criswell / Erika Meade vs Edith Kruckmann / Thea Junt0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Buckalew / Teri Doyle vs Amy Dabbous / Daisha Moore5-7, 3-6
2026-05-22vs North Texas RC/Weber W4.0TSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulia Duong / Karen Buckalew vs Kassandra Fish / Sonja Bocklage3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Akbany / Teri Doyle vs Karen Newby / Nora Olthof6-4, 6-2
2026-05-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Duong / Rosalyn Luong vs Camille Davenport / Jacqueline Carson2-6, 2-6
2026-05-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTeri Doyle / Tracy Constantino vs Christina Bell / Jenifer Summers1-6, 1-6
2026-05-07vs The Nelson/Wood W4.0TWon 10
W#2 DoublesErika Meade / April Parker vs Elizabeth Smith / Blaine Eschenburg6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Sanella Wertz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.84
Karen Buckalew
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Sarah Wollitz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Julie Hoang
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.73
April Parker
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Julia Duong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Rosalyn Luong
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.66
Ryane Criswell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.63
Heather Helsel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Teri Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Michelle Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Erika Meade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Brenda Bingham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Tracy Akbany
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.39
Tracy Constantino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.28
Jennifer Deaton
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Jessica Thota
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
Marge Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Sampeck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Deaton + Brenda Bingham6058% games+7.5% vs expected
Michelle Buchanan + Tracy Akbany3256% games+3.4% vs expected
Ryane Criswell + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julia Duong134 matchesnot enough data
Rosalyn Luong + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Wollitz + Julie Hoang404 matchesnot enough data
Sanella Wertz + Jessica Thota134 matchesnot enough data
Ryane Criswell + Sarah Wollitz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanella Wertz
9W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Karen Buckalew
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Sarah Wollitz
21W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Julie Hoang
39W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
April Parker
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Julia Duong
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Rosalyn Luong
21W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Ryane Criswell
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Heather Helsel
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Teri Doyle
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.60
Michelle Buchanan
16W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Erika Meade
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Brenda Bingham
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Tracy Akbany
25W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Tracy Constantino
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
Jennifer Deaton
20W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Jessica Thota
13W–20L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marge Goodman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Sampeck
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.