Teams

Br.Shait18S

2023 Cap 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-08-01vs Sa.Highsmith18SWon 30
W#1 SinglesBeth Gildea vs Sarah Newton6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Sheri Erhart7-5, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Sarah Sims Chesson6-1, 6-0
2023-07-17Won 20
W#1 SinglesLauren Fye vs Jessica Williams6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Kelly Thompson6-3, 6-4
2023-07-10vs St.Fogarty18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBeth Gildea vs Rossana Prevost6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesLaura Wingo vs Stephanie Fogarty1-6, 4-6
2023-07-04vs Kr.Esham18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSara Mazurak vs Mary Allison Raper6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLauren Fye vs Amy Cantando6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Amy Gadke4-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs Ke.O'Rourke18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesBeth Gildea vs Alise Fredrickson5-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Colleen Tapen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-26vs Sh.Marconi18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesLauren Fye vs Claire Limon2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-12vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesSara Mazurak vs Barbara Williams6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Mary Lewis James6-4, 6-2
2023-06-05vs La.McRee18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Rossi Evans6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesLaura Wingo vs Emily Andino4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Lauren Fye
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Sara Mazurak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Beth Gildea
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Brianna Shait
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Stephanie Poley
published
2.55
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.55
Erin Maher
published
2.10
Laura Wingo
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Mazurak + Lauren Fye12562% games+7.1% vs expected
Brianna Shait + Sara Mazurak7169% gamesnot enough data
Mandy Steinhardt + Laura Wingo1633% gamesnot enough data
Brianna Shait + Lauren Fye3351% gamesnot enough data
Beth Gildea + Brianna Shait314 matchesnot enough data
Beth Gildea + Lauren Fye303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lauren Fye
217W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Sara Mazurak
167W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3
Beth Gildea
89W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Brianna Shait
86W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Stephanie Poley
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Mandy Steinhardt
52W–90L career · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Erin Maher
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.55
2.5
Laura Wingo
29W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.