Teams

IND-Haynie/Temby

2021 Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-08-01vs CBRC-Not Todds TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesVincent Beasley / Maritess Haynie vs Edward Kim / Xia Suter6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMark Kerber / Laura Temby vs Pane Stankovic / Michelle Glenn2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Buck / Evoria Beasley vs Nikolla Qafoku / Jolene Boughton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-31vs PC-PerryWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Kerber / Laura Temby vs Todd Samuel / Annette Rose6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVincent Beasley / Maritess Haynie vs Jim Perry / Carrie Perry6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Bruggeman / Julie Monson vs Renee Brockman / Scott Dowson2-6, 1-5
2021-07-31vs WRAC-LesterWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Kerber / Laura Temby vs Tracy Yount / Katie Yount3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVincent Beasley / Evoria Beasley vs Brooks Davenport / Julie Davenport6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Buck / Julie Monson vs Michael Bendtsen / Holly VanderSchalie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-30vs YTC-StephenWon 21
W#1 DoublesVincent Beasley / Maritess Haynie vs Richard Lozano / Estelle Patten6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Kerber / Laura Temby vs Dawn Degrasse / Shaun Anderson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Bruggeman / Julie Monson vs Rebecca Stewart Rust / Danny Anslinger7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CBRC-Not Todds Team318412109
2YTC-Stephen318413106
3IND-Haynie/Temby317514115
4PC-Perry136613106
5WRAC-Lester0411122133

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Vincent Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Julie Monson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Evoria Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jeff Bruggeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Buck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Temby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Maritess Haynie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Kerber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vincent Beasley + Maritess Haynie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vincent Beasley
48W–35L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Julie Monson
207W–138L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
4
Elizabeth Hanson Smith
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Evoria Beasley
14W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Bruggeman
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Buck
14W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Temby
78W–51L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maritess Haynie
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Kerber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.