Teams

Su.Rose55A

2024 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-22vs Mi.Yates55AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMillie Rushton / Paula Hale vs Jami Kim-Rowley / Brenda Li4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-15vs Sh.Cole55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesGrace McPherson / Millie Rushton vs Marylou Salmon / Sharon Cole5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-08vs Ta.LeFevre55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLynda Blelloch / Millie Rushton vs Debbie Powell / Kellie Snider0-6, 3-6
2024-04-01vs Gi.Flynn55AWon 10
W#3 DoublesGrace McPherson / Millie Rushton vs Gina Goldthwaite / Shelly Rogers6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-25vs Gi.Flynn55ALost 01
L#3 DoublesIndia Pleasants / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Elizabeth Lyle / Lee Anne Oxford6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-03-11vs Mi.Yates55ALost 02
L#2 DoublesLeslie O'Brien / Millie Rushton vs Amy Barclay / Jami Kim-Rowley1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGrace McPherson / Andrea Pfeiffer vs Tiffany Eastley / Jannette White4-6, 6-7
2024-03-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMillie Rushton / Malinda Schantz vs Kelly Creekmore / Juli Johnson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Noelle Jackson
published
3.28
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.27
Leslie O'Brien
published
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
published
3.18
Paula Hale
published
3.06
Karen Cody
published
3.02
Millie Rushton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Malinda Schantz
published
2.73
Wanda Wilson
published
2.61
India Pleasants
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Millie Rushton + Andrea Pfeiffer3644% games−2.1% vs expected
India Pleasants + Wanda Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.28
Leslie O'Brien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Lynda Blelloch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.20
Paula Hale
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
Karen Cody
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Millie Rushton
25W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 4 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.93
Malinda Schantz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Wanda Wilson
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
India Pleasants
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.