Teams

LTFC BLUE

2025 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-18vs VCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesHenry Sanin / Janet Hill vs Shelbee Riehl / Jake Dosen6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Moskowitz / Kyle Nelson vs Matt Yeingst / Sarah Esther6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Lash / Mitchell Kaplan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-11vs SS-LT PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRagunath Prahalathan / Erin Clark vs Sean Allen / Erica Hynek6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMaggie Carson / Aaron Nall vs David Duganne / Norine Nelson Martin6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Marle / Emily Marle vs MaryBeth Doerr / Stephen Houy6-2, 6-4
2025-05-04vs RRTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Marle / Peter Marle vs Ashley Franklin / Andrew Doyle6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Moskowitz / Kyle Nelson vs Nickie Le / Blair Gifford6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Lash / Mitchell Kaplan vs Khanh Gifford / Tony Gubenko2-6, 5-7
2025-04-27vs CCV ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesAaron Nall / Maggie Carson vs Jason Abrams / Monica Bogue4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Hilton / Janet Hill vs Arion Robbins / Marne Melun3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKyle Nelson / Erin Clark vs Jake Filene / Ashley Wilson2-6, 6-7
2025-04-20vs PRC YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesAudrey Moskowitz / Ragunath Prahalathan vs Alexander Linville / Franny Schmidt6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPeter Marle / Emily Marle vs Carrie del Toro / Matthew Montoya4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Hill / Jeffrey Hilton vs Donna Chan / Douglas Jones6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs GAC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesAaron Nall / Maggie Carson vs Daniel Routh / Laura Routh3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHenry Sanin / Erin Clark vs Paul Buckner / Cassandra Buckner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitchell Kaplan / Lisa Lash vs Russell Stewart / Sarah Anderson6-7, 6-7
2025-04-06vs WC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesRagunath Prahalathan / Audrey Moskowitz vs Becca Rinn / Gerry Rinn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHenry Sanin / Erin Clark vs Eric Dick / CC Dick6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaggie Carson / Jeffrey Hilton vs Emily Lewis / Brad Lewis3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Emily Marle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Jeffrey Hilton
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.45
Ragunath Prahalathan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Henry Sanin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Aaron Nall
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Janet Hill
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Kyle Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Audrey Moskowitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Peter Marle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.16
Maggie Carson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Lisa Lash
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.06
Erin Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Mitchell Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Marle + Peter Marle29965% games+13.5% vs expected
Maggie Carson + Aaron Nall9655% games+7.0% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Mitchell Kaplan7652% games−3.3% vs expected
Lisa Lash + Henry Sanin4253% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Hilton + Erin Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Hilton + Janet Hill224 matchesnot enough data
Erin Clark + Henry Sanin134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Clark + Ragunath Prahalathan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Marle
87W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jeffrey Hilton
42W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Ragunath Prahalathan
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Henry Sanin
103W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aaron Nall
21W–12L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Janet Hill
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Kyle Nelson
23W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Audrey Moskowitz
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Peter Marle
109W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Maggie Carson
21W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Lisa Lash
102W–82L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Erin Clark
36W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Mitchell Kaplan
28W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.