Teams

GTC-Pinyerd-9.0

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Earle McWright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Kim Hood
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2023-12-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavin Hanton / Kim Hood vs Matthew Huynh / Brandy Nakada1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-11-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Pinyerd / Kim Hood vs Dayna Guizzetti / James Crutchfield6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hood / Michael Cheong vs Ryan Cho / Reanne Lee6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-11-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavin Hanton / Kim Hood vs James Crutchfield / Kendra Vineyard6-3, 6-2
2023-11-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hood / Davin Hanton vs Paul Koessler / Dayna Guizzetti7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-10-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Hood / Alexander Noyes vs Jackie Vandenberg / John Hieb6-0, 6-1
2023-10-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hood / Josh Pinyerd vs Richard Deitz / Esther Kim6-3, 6-3
2023-09-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJosh Pinyerd / Kim Hood vs Hana Farr / Robert Ling6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Earle McWright
64W–36L career
not enough data
4.5
Kim Hood
151W–135L career
11%89%0%
4.01

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.