Teams

Terracciano/18/3.0/WN/STCC

2024 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-18vs May/18/3.0/WN/SHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRhonda Terracciano / Alisa Cotton vs Krysta Cyr / Ene Wang5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLila Knicely vs Kristen Doyal6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTina Callecod vs Madeline Slack1-6, 4-6
2024-04-03vs Price-Wray/18/3.0/WN/STCCLost 23
W#1 DoublesAlisa Cotton / Rhonda Terracciano vs Emily Burns / Caroline Garcia3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarmen Ramsey vs Emma Turner3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Hopkins / Stacey Cormier vs Angie Wray / Elizabeth Wagner5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJocelyn Hooper vs Sarah Hatfield1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelinda Hernandez / Marianne Boston vs Ashley Price / Lauren Hubble6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-27vs Clayton/18/3.0/WN/QTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesRhonda Terracciano / Alisa Cotton vs Kelly Wiggins / Brandi Simms6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDeniz Gungor vs Kelly Clayton7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Hopkins / Marianne Boston vs Lindsey Cotton / Maggie Boston6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJocelyn Hooper vs Kelsey Kiper6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacey Cormier / Gail Brown vs Nikki Hanna / Brianna Gordon6-1, 6-3
2024-03-20vs Mitchell-Greer/18/3.0/WN/POTCLost 14
L#1 DoublesMarianne Boston / Melinda Hernandez vs Olga Melvin / Rachael Deere5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLila Knicely vs Jane Dickson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesConcepcion Ciardullo / Jocelyn Hooper vs MLiss Sella / Marjorie Briley7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDeniz Gungor vs Lauren Stanton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Terracciano / Heidi Kallenberg vs Sonia Godfrey / Emily Horne5-7, 4-6
2024-02-21vs Ball/18/3.0/WN/BTCWon 41
W#1 DoublesRhonda Terracciano / Alisa Cotton vs Skylar Floyd / Candace Harris6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTina Callecod vs Veronica Anderson6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMelinda Hernandez / Stacey Cormier vs Cindy Courtney / Amy Basinger0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesDeniz Gungor vs Holley Chapman6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJocelyn Hooper / Gail Brown vs Chandni Chatrath / MacKenzie Kyle6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Lila Knicely
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.87
Tina Callecod
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Alisa Cotton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Ann Harvey
published 3
2.83
Rhonda Terracciano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.76
Jocelyn Hooper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Heidi Kallenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Concepcion Ciardullo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Deniz Gungor
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.66
Marianne Boston
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Carmen Ramsey
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Stacey Cormier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Melinda Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Gail Brown
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jocelyn Hooper + Ann Harvey3343% games+0.4% vs expected
Alisa Cotton + Rhonda Terracciano111048% games−1.8% vs expected
Rhonda Terracciano + Jocelyn Hooper3349% games−3.3% vs expected
Gail Brown + Heidi Kallenberg1441% games−3.3% vs expected
Rhonda Terracciano + Heidi Kallenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Hernandez + Marianne Boston123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Hernandez + Ann Harvey213 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Terracciano + Ann Harvey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lila Knicely
19W–15L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.89
Tina Callecod
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Alisa Cotton
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Ann Harvey
26W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
Rhonda Terracciano
71W–62L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%90%10%
2.83
Jocelyn Hooper
58W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Heidi Kallenberg
25W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Concepcion Ciardullo
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Deniz Gungor
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
Marianne Boston
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Carmen Ramsey
5W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Stacey Cormier
24W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Melinda Hernandez
18W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
Gail Brown
27W–49L career · 7 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.