Teams

Fischels winter 24

2024 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 8.0 MX (SUN)

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-10vs Henrich/Von SeggernLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Reidinger / Brian Reidinger vs Margaret Kelley / James Rick1-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs Tretsven/Cammack Winter 2024Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Caryn Myhre / Nathan Tretsven1-6, 3-6
2024-01-28vs Chase/EdwardsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Phillip Chase / Whitney Nyholm7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-14vs Goodwin: Net Assets Winter 2024Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Reidinger / Dawn Reidinger vs Greg Elfstrum / Yuko Goodwin0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Eric Bender
published
3.88
Laura Tiffany
published
3.81
David Neis
published 4
3.74
Brian Reidinger
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.67
Angela Fischels
published 4
3.61
Jon Swanson
published
3.34
Dawn Reidinger
published 3.5
3.25
Beth Turnbull
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Reidinger + Brian Reidinger82142% games+1.8% vs expected
Angela Fischels + David Neis1440% games−9.7% vs expected
Angela Fischels + Jon Swanson2645% gamesnot enough data
Angela Fischels + Brian Reidinger134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Bender
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Laura Tiffany
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
3.88
4
David Neis
11W–21L career · type M · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Brian Reidinger
92W–175L career · 11 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Angela Fischels
46W–79L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Jon Swanson
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dawn Reidinger
111W–146L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Beth Turnbull
2W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.