Teams

BC-MCC/NahiaHossain

2025 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Jinous Hamidi
published
2.79
Garima Goel
published
2.77
Anne DeMartini
published 3
Dana Leyland
published 3
2.65
Diane Saunders
published 3
2.64
Helen Evers
published
2.59
Ashita Johnson
published 3
2.55
Patti Panucci
published
2.53
Cindy Emanuel
published 3
2.50
Linda Buchanan
published
2.49
Candice Maloney
published 3
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
2.39
Staci Carey
published
2.36
Cecilia Fileti
published 3
Janet Wisialowski
published
Julie Fields
published
Leah Niehaus
published
Melissa Fernandez
published
Susanne Elstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candice Maloney + Staci Carey3537% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Emanuel + Garima Goel044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jinous Hamidi
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Garima Goel
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dana Leyland
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Saunders
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Helen Evers
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Ashita Johnson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Patti Panucci
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Cindy Emanuel
17W–29L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Linda Buchanan
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Candice Maloney
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Staci Carey
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
3
Cecilia Fileti
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
Janet Wisialowski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Fields
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Niehaus
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Fernandez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susanne Elstein
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.