Teams

Adams, Amber

2024 EKOLU-JXN · 7.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jay Irving
published
3.19
Amber Mullin
published 3.5
3.17
Scott Holston
published
3.13
Stephanie Sing
published
3.09
Beverly Turner
published 3.5
2.91
Mary Nalder
published
2.80
Joseph Boler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Turner + Amber Mullin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Irving
48W–40L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Amber Mullin
41W–26L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Scott Holston
37W–51L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.17
Stephanie Sing
59W–58L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beverly Turner
45W–53L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mary Nalder
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Joseph Boler
23W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.