Teams

Mixed Nuts

2022 SVTA Mixed 18 & Over · SVTA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-27vs LGCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesStewart Herbert / Peter Anthony vs Carol Remen / James Herbert2-6, 2-6
2022-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStewart Herbert / Dale Schulz vs Peter Schmidt / Bethany Mathis2-6, 3-6
2022-03-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChip Hathaway / Lisa White vs Kenneth Sweet / Robin Sweet4-6, 6-7
2022-02-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Lisa White vs Donna Lee / Archer Crebbs5-7, 6-7
2022-02-06vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#3 DoublesSheila Harrell / Khris Baxter vs Carrie Berlin / Terry Owsley6-2, 6-0
2022-01-29vs LGCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesStewart Herbert / Peter Anthony vs Torben Svenningsen / Maria Svenningsen7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Lisa White vs Carol Remen / James Herbert6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-01-15vs Chestnut ForksWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Linares / Chandler van Voorhis vs Garrett Manahan / Bethany Mathis6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SVTA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Chip Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.84
Maria Eldredge
published
3.74
Sharon Linares
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Stewart Herbert
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.66
Ashley la Shelle
published 4
3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Billings
published 3.5
3.12
Maria Costea
published
2.93
Thomas Dunlap
published
2.75
Lisa White
published
Khris Baxter
published
Nick Jenkins
published
Will Nisbet
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chip Hathaway
207W–115L career · 8 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Maria Eldredge
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Sharon Linares
162W–90L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Stewart Herbert
101W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Ashley la Shelle
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Elizabeth Billings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Thomas Dunlap
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
Lisa White
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Khris Baxter
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Jenkins
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Will Nisbet
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.