Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs Andresen - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlenda Jones / Mary Bryan vs Sue Nast / Tanya Hughes4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-21vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 SinglesRene Abel vs Amelia Gandy4-6, 1-6
2022-06-14vs Payne - RS HardWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Cindy Jenista vs Wendi Best / Elaine Hayward6-3, 6-2
2022-05-31vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Newton / Susan Bonsignore vs Dodi Stringfellow / Maureen Proctor2-6, 3-6
2022-05-24vs Payne - RS HardWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Rene Abel vs Emma Graf / Kristin Drlicka6-4, 6-0
2022-05-17vs Andresen - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Humphrey / Mary Bryan vs Amanda Brown / Alycia Esmonde0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRene Abel vs Catherine Yoo6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPolly Armstrong / Susan Bonsignore vs Sam Richardson / Karen Penn7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-10vs Tan - SHLSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Bryan / Cindy Jenista vs Ive Marsach / Kathleen Galinis3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesRene Abel vs Tori Baker6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Rene Abel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Emily Ioakim
published 3.5
3.35
Denise Wilson
published 3.5
3.33
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
Ann Scott
published 3.5
Creagh Ekelund
published 3.5
3.23
Mary Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Kim Humphrey
published
3.12
Susan Bonsignore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Jenista
published 3
Leigh Causey
published
Lisa Greskovich
published
Polly Armstrong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bonsignore + Mary Bryan0538% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Rene Abel
122W–57L career · type A · 9 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Emily Ioakim
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Denise Wilson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ann Scott
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Creagh Ekelund
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kim Humphrey
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Cindy Jenista
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Causey
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Greskovich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Polly Armstrong
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.