Teams

MONTEREY TC 40AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-03-09vs CHAMISAL TC 40AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Negrey / George Taylor vs Matt Hilliard / Scott Kelley4-6, 2-6
2024-02-10vs LA MADRONA SR 40AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesRob Leake / George Taylor vs Ed Costa / Jordi Aladro6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Branislav Kovac
published 4
3.84
John Negrey
published 4
3.75
George Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Matthew Marsh
published
3.65
Mitch Priest
published
3.63
Lee Malaspina
published 4
3.58
Bharat Poria
published 4
3.58
James Burke
published
3.56
Corneliu Dane
published 4
3.35
Dan Ray Miller
published 3.5
3.35
Dean Young
published 4
3.29
Tom Pettengill
published
3.29
John Machmiller
published
John Dicconson
published
Rob Leake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Negrey + Lee Malaspina3255% games+1.4% vs expected
Dan Ray Miller + Rob Leake6158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Branislav Kovac
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
John Negrey
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Christopher Glynn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
George Taylor
121W–113L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Marsh
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.72
Mitch Priest
11W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Lee Malaspina
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Bharat Poria
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
James Burke
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.58
4
Corneliu Dane
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dan Ray Miller
14W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
4
Dean Young
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
Tom Pettengill
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
John Machmiller
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
John Dicconson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rob Leake
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.