Teams

Set 2 Win

2021 18&Over Women · 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-07-22vs Park: JosephLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine White / Mary Ellen Weller vs Karen Massarotti / Marlene Dashkoff2-6, 6-6
L#1 SinglesChristina Bleckinger vs Tara Vukelic1-6, 1-6
2021-07-15vs HRC: JosephWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie Popadick / Jennifer Giegel vs M J Orazi / Heather Carson-Wake6-1, 6-1
2021-07-08vs Western: You’ve Been ServedLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristina Bleckinger / Jennifer Giegel vs Michele Bergevin / Elizabeth Schultz4-6, 3-6
2021-07-01vs Park: JosephLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine White / Christina Bleckinger vs Karen Massarotti / Marlene Dashkoff6-7, 5-2
2021-06-24vs HRC: JosephWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Bleckinger / Maria Hardcastle vs Nicole Bundy / Shelby Little2-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesAnn Marie Popadick / Christine White vs M J Orazi / Leah Pappas0-6, 0-6
2021-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Bleckinger / Ann Marie Popadick vs Beth Gosch / Elizabeth Schultz2-6, 7-6
2021-06-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChristina Bleckinger vs Tara Vukelic0-6, 0-6
2021-06-03vs HRC: JosephWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine White / Laurie Kullman vs Shaniel Wisniewski / M J Orazi6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMaria Hardcastle vs Shelby Little1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-27vs Western: You’ve Been ServedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Bleckinger / Heather Baumeister vs Shelly Cavalier / Patricia McGrath6-3, 6-7
W#2 DoublesChristine White / Ann Marie Popadick vs Nancy Lazar / Beth Gosch1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: You’ve Been Served0918716165
2Set 2 Win0915930233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ann Marie Popadick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Shelly Cavalier
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Christina Bleckinger
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Laurie Kullman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Hardcastle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mary Ellen Weller
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Renata Filarecki
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Marie Popadick
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelly Cavalier
13W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.55
Christina Bleckinger
7W–9L career · 11 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Kullman
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Maria Hardcastle
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Mary Ellen Weller
1W–16L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Renata Filarecki
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.