← Teams

GTC Boling

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Al Boling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results10 ties
2019-12-07Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDon White / Al Boling vs James Piper / James Schacht7-6, 6-3
2019-11-23Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesThomas Stumpf / Al Boling vs John Lindberg / Joseph Hartman6-2, 6-1
2019-11-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesThomas Stumpf / Al Boling vs Bruce Bennett / Keven McKern6-2, 6-2
2019-11-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesThomas Stumpf / Al Boling vs James Jackson / Mark Lindquist6-2, 7-5
2019-11-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBill Fahey / Al Boling vs George Ramirez / Ken Venneman6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2019-10-26Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesThomas Stumpf / Al Boling vs Thomas Henderson / David Stillman6-3, 6-2
2019-10-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAl Boling / Bill Fahey vs David Casebier / Rick Denslow7-6, 6-2
2019-10-05Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesThomas Stumpf / Al Boling vs Timothy Martin / George Ramirez6-4, 6-2
2019-09-22Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMark Weiser / Al Boling vs Dan Frederick / Robert Johnston7-6, 6-3
2019-09-21Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesAl Boling / Clarence Hollins vs Dave Ketchum / Joseph Zygar6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Al Boling
77W–79L career
0%95%4%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.