Teams

Harvin 4.0

2023 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-17vs Brad 4.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesParmvir Singh / James Mellendick vs Bradley Jacques / Renat Gataullin6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEric Roberts / Jagannath Surampudi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11vs Brad 4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJoshua Zoltek / Eric DesRoberts vs Aaron Weiss / Renat Gataullin7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Mellendick / Jagannath Surampudi vs David French / Bradley Jacques3-6, 2-6
2023-06-09vs Brad 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesEric DesRoberts / Parmvir Singh vs Bradley Jacques / Ryan Poole6-3, 6-1
2023-06-05vs Brad 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesParmvir Singh / Zach Manifold vs Bradley Jacques / Renat Gataullin4-6, 0-6
2023-06-04Lost 02
L#1 DoublesParmvir Singh / Joshua Zoltek vs Aaron Weiss / Renat Gataullin6-7, 3-5
L#2 DoublesJagannath Surampudi / David Kim vs Peter Bonbrest / David French1-6, 1-6
2023-05-23vs Brad 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoshua Zoltek / Jagannath Surampudi vs Bradley Jacques / Peter Bonbrest5-7, 1-6
2023-05-18vs Brad 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDon Barry / Zach Manifold vs Bradley Jacques / Glen Medina4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Joshua Zoltek
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Eric DesRoberts
published
3.59
James Mellendick
published
3.41
Parmvir Singh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Jagannath Surampudi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Zach Manifold
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Don Barry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric DesRoberts + Joshua Zoltek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joshua Zoltek
236W–137L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.13
Eric DesRoberts
41W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
James Mellendick
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Parmvir Singh
215W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Jagannath Surampudi
296W–330L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Zach Manifold
122W–136L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Don Barry
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.