Teams

GAC PINK

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-20vs KC-RH REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnn Baer / Debra Benge vs Kim Rachwalski / Kristen Weeks6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Liu / Katie Sznewajs vs Teresa Granath / Marjie Tokarski2-6, 2-6
2023-06-13vs SS-H TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Picart / Katie Sznewajs vs Holly Payne / Cheryl Sanders6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Baer / Debra Benge vs Carol Lugo / Kim MacKendrick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Roskoski / Cortni Ward vs Heidi David / Vickie Conroy7-5, 6-4
2023-06-06vs HRCA-N BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Baer / Katie Sznewajs vs Laura Hoganson / Nancy Hong1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Liu / Cortni Ward vs Joyce Naylon / Julie Johns5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-30vs GCC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLauren Elmakis / Maureen Roskoski vs Merry Logan / Hilary McDonald6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendy Liu / Cortni Ward vs Ronit Hicks / Amy Reilly6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-23vs EM GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Benge / Ann Baer vs Jll McLain / Jean Steimel6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Roskoski / Wendy Liu vs Michele Olree / Brilynn Cahill0-6, 2-6
2023-05-16vs PTC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Sznewajs / Emily Picart vs Erika Shorter / Sarah Crow3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Benge / Ann Baer vs Christina Good / Elizabeth Restivo6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaureen Roskoski / Cortni Ward vs Penny Malloy / Su Mei Chen6-4, 7-5
2023-05-09vs HW BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Picart / Katie Sznewajs vs Meredith van Wyk / Jill Smith6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Baer / Debra Benge vs Jennifer Johnson / Kathe Gouin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Liu / Cortni Ward vs Kirsten Washer / Daniele Dattilo3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Cortni Ward
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Maureen Roskoski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Ann Baer
published 3.5
3.10
Debra Benge
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.05
Katie Sznewajs
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Benge + Ann Baer5648% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cortni Ward
89W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Maureen Roskoski
50W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Ann Baer
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Debra Benge
107W–104L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Katie Sznewajs
36W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.