Teams

Sassy Smashers

2023 NOVA Combo Women · NOVA COMBO 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-09vs ComboNationSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Davis / Melinda Capitano vs Anne Ward / Kendra McQuillan5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGenea Kennedy / Laura Coombs vs Jennifer Yoon / Deborah Williams6-4, 6-2
2023-08-30vs Team LangenLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Coombs / Erika Hoyt vs Paige Bartlett / Abby Colucci4-6, 6-7
2023-08-27vs Break PointLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Coombs / Kristin Satterfield vs Amanda Kerr / Tara Reynolds4-6, 2-6
2023-08-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Elisa Wolf vs Alison Naden / Betsy Payne1-6, 3-6
2023-08-12vs 40-LoveSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Kim McCool vs Judy OConnor / Eve Pandit4-6, 2-5
W#3 DoublesGenea Kennedy / Elisa Wolf vs Kristin Kahn / Tiffany Malloy6-0, 7-5
2023-08-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesLiz Tran / Elisa Wolf vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Andrea Davis vs Brooke Daniels / Colleen Peacher6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Coombs / Genea Kennedy vs Laura Mattis / Dara Okamoto7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMelinda Capitano / Andrea Davis vs Caroline Houston / Patricia Morris6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA COMBO 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Yuan Zhang
published
3.53
Kristin Satterfield
published
3.51
Josephine Cooper
published
3.42
Genea Kennedy
published 3.5
3.33
Elisa Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Laura Coombs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Melinda Capitano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Erika Hoyt
published 3.5
2.70
Kim McCool
published
2.68
Lina Saliba
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuan Zhang
48W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
Kristin Satterfield
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Josephine Cooper
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Genea Kennedy
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Elisa Wolf
177W–86L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Laura Coombs
29W–15L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Melinda Capitano
81W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Erika Hoyt
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Kim McCool
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Lina Saliba
7W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.