← Teams

MPRC-Atkins

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jim DeWeese
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Michael Feely
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Steve Scharfstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Steven Garlock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
James Stenger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Tommy Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Gerald Chase
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Jeff Cruze
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
—
Robert Lefeber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 0
Results8 ties
2024-05-09Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJim DeWeese / Dan Wolff vs Steven Grant / James Horen6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGerald Chase / Steven Garlock vs Andrew Kitchen / Alan Potts6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRex Smith / Michael Feely vs William Pettis / Mark Becker7-6, 6-3
2024-05-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSteve Scharfstein / Dan Wolff vs Mister Archedon / Alan Jones6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Garlock / Michael Feely vs Clay Funkhouser / David Shook6-3, 7-5
2024-04-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJim DeWeese / Gerald Chase vs Mark Mitchell / JOHN KNOX7-6, 6-4
2024-04-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJim DeWeese / Dan Wolff vs Thomas Mehlhorn / Randall Sinn6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTommy Atkins / Robert Lefeber vs Steven Grant / William Pettis6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Cruze / Tom Tsuruta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTommy Atkins / Jim DeWeese vs John Popplewell / Roger North6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDan Wolff / Dale Vandenburgh vs Randy Boose / Vilath Oudomphong6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Kohlhoff / Robert Lefeber vs Steven Boeh / Philip Rothrock6-3, 6-1
2024-03-28Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTommy Atkins / Jeff Cruze vs Alan Kaplan / Doug Cumming6-4, 6-2
2024-03-21Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJim DeWeese / James Stenger vs Craig Frasier / Jeff Wheeler7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDan Wolff / Dale Vandenburgh vs Charles Gebhardt / John Hummel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Cohns / Steven Garlock vs Daniel Rousseau / Dave Sato2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesSteven Garlock / Tom Tsuruta vs Hayward Reed / Bruce Yang6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJeff Cruze / Jim DeWeese vs Rick Raivio / Rolf Ellingsen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jim DeWeese
89W–73L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Michael Feely
11W–15L career · type S
not enough data
—
3.5
Steve Scharfstein
8W–19L career · type S
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Steven Garlock
16W–21L career
not enough data
—
3.5
James Stenger
16W–14L career
12%87%2%
3.18
3.5
Dan Wolff
25W–51L career
12%88%1%
3.16
3.5
Tommy Atkins
22W–53L career
14%86%0%
3.10
3.5
Gerald Chase
52W–41L career
28%72%0%
3.06
0
Jeff Cruze
1W–4L career
not enough data
—
0
Robert Lefeber
10W–3L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.