Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Day

2023 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

14 players · average NTRP 3.28 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-09vs Ivory Ridge-Smith/AllenLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Jennifer Sampson vs Sharlene Enloe / Trista Willardson2-6, 1-6
2023-12-09Lost 01
L#1 Female DoublesBessy Nielson / Molly Adams vs Michelle Maxfield / Kim Cronin3-6, 5-3, 0-1
2023-12-09vs Ogden-MouldingLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesShannon Halverson / Brooke Rollins vs Brooke Curtis / Jacki Joseph3-6, 0-6
2023-12-02Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesElaine Day / Alexandra Spruill vs Michelle Maxfield / Gretel Sampson6-1, 7-6
2023-12-02vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesBessy Nielson / Maria Pettit vs Sarah Villareal / Alison Beesley6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesShannon Halverson / Collette Renstrom vs Sarah Law / Kadee Wolfgram5-7, 1-2
W#3 Female DoublesMelanie Decker / Lori Wilson vs Hayley Shaffer / Kelly LaFrance6-3, 2-4, 1-0
2023-11-18vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BastianWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesShannon Halverson / Bessy Nielson vs Delia Bayna / Sara Longlee6-2, 6-4
2023-11-11Lost 01
L#3 Female DoublesMelanie Decker / Maria Pettit vs Elizabeth West / Chris Peterson2-6, 1-6
2023-11-04vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesCollette Renstrom / Melanie Decker vs Cozette Caron / Brooke McCloskey2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kassie Torres
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 20% · published 4
3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brooke Rollins
published 3.5
3.24
Megan Reardon
published
3.23
Collette Renstrom
published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
published 3
2.91
Lori Wilson
published
2.86
Shannon Halverson
usually #2 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
published
2.63
Elaine Day
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Melanie Decker
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Molly Adams
published
Sophie Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Adams + Kassie Torres7355% games+13.1% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Collette Renstrom4257% games+9.7% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams8453% games+8.9% vs expected
Lori Wilson + Rebecca Harman41641% games+1.8% vs expected
Elaine Day + Kassie Torres4252% games+1.7% vs expected
Diane Poole + Molly Adams4156% games+0.9% vs expected
Megan Reardon + Brooke Rollins3644% games−1.2% vs expected
Shannon Halverson + Collette Renstrom6641% games−1.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Brooke Rollins
56W–97L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Reardon
40W–58L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Collette Renstrom
61W–77L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Lori Wilson
70W–154L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.91
3
Shannon Halverson
25W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Elaine Day
123W–244L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Melanie Decker
49W–170L career · 3 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
2.42
Molly Adams
101W–77L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sophie Jackson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.