Teams

CCRC - Bernardi

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs West Lake - SmithWon 50
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Lagmay / Margaret Childs vs Holly Hendrix / Kari Jones6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTalita Bernardi vs Cheryl Gamble6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Parham / Pam Callaway vs Dana Callaway / Pamela Lee6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGuanyu Li vs Brianna Patel6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMye Duke / Brinda Muraleedharan vs Shannon Whitwell / Karen Glass6-4, 6-2
2025-02-16vs CSRATA Ellen HarperLost 23
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Parham / Pam Callaway vs Ashley Bass / Christina Thompson0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLun Cai vs KRISTY ZGOL6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGuanyu Li / Michell Davis vs Taylor Childress / Kathryn Lindsey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTalita Bernardi vs Emily Swafford6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTanya Gibbons / Brinda Muraleedharan vs Debbie Christy / Dori Cash6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-09vs NTC - AddymanWon 31
L#1 DoublesPreeti Batra / Pam Callaway vs Kimberly Trapp / Caroline Sullivan2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTalita Bernardi vs Anna Bianca7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGloria Gray / Tanya Gibbons vs Jennifer Olmstead / Natalie Lane7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGuanyu Li / Jacqueline Parham vs Gwenda Sanderson / Nora Rader3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-02-02vs RVP - JohnsonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLun Cai / Brinda Muraleedharan vs Jeanette Pellot / Hannah Corbitt1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGuanyu Li / Margaret Childs vs Jaclyn Bohanan / Lisa Bell5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTanya Gibbons vs Anna Parviainen1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPam Callaway / Jacqueline Parham vs Caylee Snelling / Ashley Johnson6-4, 7-6
2025-01-26vs RVP - BaldyWon 40
W#1 SinglesLun Cai vs Barb Ecktman6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPam Callaway / Jacqueline Parham vs Lyndi Baldy / Sheri Brackett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesGuanyu Li vs Saranne Perman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMye Duke / Gloria Gray vs Kristen Williams / Dana McElmurray6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lun Cai
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Talita Bernardi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.01
Michell Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Margaret Childs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Preeti Batra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Guanyu Li
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Jocelyn Lagmay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Brinda Muraleedharan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.79
Pam Callaway
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Jacqueline Parham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.74
Tanya Gibbons
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.72
Mye Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gloria Gray
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lun Cai + Talita Bernardi6357% games+4.4% vs expected
Lun Cai + Jocelyn Lagmay5158% games+4.1% vs expected
Jacqueline Parham + Pam Callaway4250% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Parham + Tanya Gibbons224 matchesnot enough data
Jocelyn Lagmay + Guanyu Li314 matchesnot enough data
Jocelyn Lagmay + Margaret Childs303 matchesnot enough data
Guanyu Li + Michell Davis213 matchesnot enough data
Michell Davis + Pam Callaway123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lun Cai
47W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Talita Bernardi
41W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Michell Davis
37W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Margaret Childs
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Preeti Batra
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Guanyu Li
22W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Jocelyn Lagmay
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Brinda Muraleedharan
17W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Pam Callaway
15W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Jacqueline Parham
16W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Tanya Gibbons
15W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Mye Duke
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Gloria Gray
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.