Teams

Boggs

2026 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 40 & Over · 8.0 Adult Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-14vs RobbinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGene Stickney / Sarah Wakefield vs Kimberly Lott / Trevas Cruz2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCamille Cruz / Ivan Acosta vs Elvira Cruz / Joe Alvarez6-4, 6-2
2026-06-14vs BorenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamille Cruz / Ivan Acosta vs Rocco Testini / Kacy Bednarz6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesYograj Patel / Sarah Wakefield vs Amy Boren / James Guevara1-6, 5-7
2026-06-13vs RobbinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCamille Cruz / Ivan Acosta vs David Stalcup / Amanda White2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Wakefield / Yograj Patel vs Randy Robbins / Kimberly Lott6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-10vs BorenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Wakefield / Gene Stickney vs Rocco Testini / Renee Cook1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCamille Cruz / Stephen Dalton vs Dain Guetersloh / Angela Trevithick7-6, 6-2
2026-06-03vs RobbinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesCamille Cruz / Stephen Dalton vs Joe Alvarez / Elvira Cruz3-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs BorenLost 12
L#1 DoublesCamille Cruz / Stephen Dalton vs Michael Flores / Ginger Wayland4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Hastings / Kary Callen vs Rocco Testini / Renee Cook6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Wakefield / Yograj Patel vs Paulette Sturdivant / Matt Nichols4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Camille Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Stephen Dalton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Ivan Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Yograj Patel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Sarah Wakefield
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Gene Stickney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Kary Callen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Cody Boggs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Kelly Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Dalton + Camille Cruz123 matchesnot enough data
Camille Cruz + Ivan Acosta213 matchesnot enough data
Yograj Patel + Sarah Wakefield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Camille Cruz
16W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Stephen Dalton
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Ivan Acosta
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Yograj Patel
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Sarah Wakefield
7W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.41
Gene Stickney
11W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
Kary Callen
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3
Cody Boggs
39W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Kelly Welch
9W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.