Teams

BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs OP-Wilk/Phillips (55s 6.5W C)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Christie Teaney vs Tracy Wilkinson / Annita Best6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Roberson / Kelly Varnell vs Katherine Williams / Susan Hardison1-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSharon Christian / Veda Moore vs Lori Baker / Lulu Conekin6-3, 5-6
2025-10-03vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristie Teaney / Kathy Garren vs Doreen Hyet / Ann Game4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Boles / Julie Warren vs Jean Herscovici / Terry Shoup6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaren Barondes / Veda Moore vs Yvonne Kleiman / Lisa Zurawski5-7, 0-6
2025-09-20vs OP-Wilk/Phillips (55s 6.5W C)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Paige Anderson vs Tracy Wilkinson / Annita Best7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Garren / Laura Sweet vs Sandy Phillips / Susan Hardison3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTina Brandalik / Julie Warren vs Debra Johann / Kathryn Custer2-6, 2-6
2025-08-30vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Christie Teaney vs Lisa Zurawski / Rachel Smith7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Garren / Suzanne Lea vs Jean Herscovici / Yvonne Kleiman6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Flower / Samira Said vs Gayle Daras / Ann Game6-7, 1-6
2025-08-24vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSharon Christian / Paige Anderson vs Lisa Zurawski / Rachel Smith7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Garren / Kelly Varnell vs Diane McKeel / Yvonne Kleiman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Brandalik / Veda Moore vs Jean Herscovici / Nicole Carlyle6-7, 2-6
2025-08-22vs OP-Wilk/Phillips (55s 6.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Christie Teaney vs Debra Johann / Kathryn Custer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Brandalik / Laura Sweet vs Tracy Wilkinson / Annita Best1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Barondes / Veda Moore vs Katherine Williams / Katherine James4-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs OP-Wilk/Phillips (55s 6.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Paige Anderson vs Sandy Phillips / Susan Hardison3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Christian / Laura Sweet vs Tracy Wilkinson / Annita Best2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Roberson / Suzanne Lea vs Mariana Goldstein / Katherine James1-6, 1-6
2025-08-15vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Boles / Kelly Varnell vs Lisa Zurawski / Susan Moore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Christian / Laura Sweet vs Terry Shoup / Gayle Daras6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55s 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Sharon Christian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Kathy Garren
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Karen Barondes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Margaret Boles
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.96
Kelly Varnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Linda Roberson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Christie Teaney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Christine Flower
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Veda Moore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Tina Brandalik
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Suzanne Lea
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Laura Sweet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Samira Said
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Boles + Christie Teaney213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Barondes + Kathy Garren303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Varnell + Tina Brandalik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Christian
22W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kathy Garren
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Karen Barondes
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Margaret Boles
17W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Kelly Varnell
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Linda Roberson
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Christie Teaney
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3.5
Christine Flower
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Veda Moore
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Tina Brandalik
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Suzanne Lea
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
Laura Sweet
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Samira Said
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.