Teams

OK/Brolick/T-Town Boys

2022 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-04-30vs MS/Gulf Coast PlittLost 12
L#1 DoublesJerry Elliott / Jim Beasley vs John Wilkinson / Bryant McCrary2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHenry Brolick / Butch Clifton vs Leonard Plitt / Danny O'Keefe6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEd Vestal / Kent Torrence vs Tod Wilson / Terry Gene Cook6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-04-30vs AR/Norby/Holmes/HSVLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Beasley / Kent Torrence vs Allen Holmes / Peter Archbold1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesButch Clifton / Henry Brolick vs Bill Norby / Bruce Turkal6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCharles Wollmershauser / Ed Vestal vs Steven Wright / Larry Dye2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-29vs TN/Reisman/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesKent Torrence / Jerry Elliott vs Don Barcus / Robert Vaughn1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHenry Brolick / Butch Clifton vs Richard Hagee / Mike Kalder6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEd Vestal / Charles Wollmershauser vs Bob Naylor / Malcolm Pratt6-3, 6-0
2022-04-28vs AR/Lee/LRWon 21
L#1 DoublesJim Beasley / Kent Torrence vs Kerry Cates / Harry Leasure1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHenry Brolick / Butch Clifton vs Glenn Grossman / John Boyd6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Wollmershauser / Ed Vestal vs Bill Barnes / John Bakalekos6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Ed Vestal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Butch Clifton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Charles Wollmershauser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Henry Brolick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jerry Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Beasley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kent Torrence
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tompie Whitworth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Butch Clifton + Ed Vestal8252% games+18.8% vs expected
Butch Clifton + Henry Brolick6452% gamesnot enough data
Kent Torrence + Henry Brolick314 matchesnot enough data
Charles Wollmershauser + Ed Vestal314 matchesnot enough data
Charles Wollmershauser + Henry Brolick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ed Vestal
52W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Butch Clifton
44W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Charles Wollmershauser
57W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Henry Brolick
23W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Jerry Elliott
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jim Beasley
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent Torrence
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tompie Whitworth
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.