Teams

MLong.8.5C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Durham Academy Upper School
Sep 21 6:30 PM
Durham Academy Upper School
Sep 28 8:00 PM
Chapel Hill Tennis Club Inc
2026-08-31vs APlachco.18C-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatya Lundberg / Hilary Tew vs Cheryl Reid / Briana Oliver4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelsey Norris / Sarah Franks vs Ana Plachco / Elizabeth Petree6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Kuzma / Terri Tarrant vs Barbara Timinskas / Lisa Montague4-6, 5-7
2026-08-24vs TWeber-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesDallas Knight / Katya Lundberg vs Button Hall / Kathryn Pollak7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerri Tarrant / Wendy Lindberg vs Liz Chen / Elizabeth Heetderks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs JRoss.8.5C-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelsey Norris / Cathy Joyce vs Justyne Ross / Anna Hodges6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kuzma / Katya Lundberg vs Tanya Sirivolu / Heidi Ross2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Cooley / Lauren Bolger vs Tiffany Kollah / Lynsey Easley5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-03vs MPaul.8.5C-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesCathy Joyce / Randy Smith vs Hillary Mulder / Spenser Radtke3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJenna Schreiber / Hilary Tew vs Elizabeth Harvie / Katie Evans4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Franks / Terri Tarrant vs Erin McAllister / Hannah White6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APlachco.18C-DUR1142559
2MLong.8.5C-DUR1142762
3MPaul.8.5C-DUR1133861
4JRoss.8.5C-DUR1124850
5TWeber-DUR02061277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Cathy Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Kelsey Norris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Katya Lundberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Bolger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Jenna Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Kristin Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Hilary Tew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.56
Dallas Knight
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Laurie Straube
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Terri Tarrant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Sarah Franks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Wendy Lindberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible12261% games+5.3% vs expected
Sarah Franks + Kelsey Norris6356% games+1.2% vs expected
Sarah Franks + Laurie Straube4154% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Joyce
123W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Kelsey Norris
25W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Katya Lundberg
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Lauren Bolger
94W–76L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Jenna Schreiber
64W–56L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kristin Cooley
34W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Hilary Tew
65W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.65
3.5
Dallas Knight
28W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Laurie Straube
169W–121L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
4
Terri Tarrant
8W–34L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sarah Franks
52W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
Wendy Lindberg
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.