Teams

JMCC/Lynch 2.5 Spring 2025

2025 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Business Women - Spring · Business Women 2.5

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-23vs COTA/Alison CunninghamLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaire Fortenberry / Claire Lynch vs Julia Dietz / Julia Wolfe1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesSusan Nixon / Mary Jane Hassell vs Brandy Chandler / Nichole Underwood6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarrie Gray / Rhonda Williams vs Jessica Crocker / Shira Hersonsky6-1, 6-1
2025-02-23vs OVP/Snyder 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarrie Gray / Rhonda Williams vs Hannah Craswell / Megan McDevitt6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Lynch / Susan Nixon vs Heather Tabor / Rebecca Wilkes2-6, 6-3, 2-6
2025-02-16vs ACC/STEELEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Jane Hassell / Susan Nixon vs Caitlin Yalamanchili / Ashley Carney7-5, 1-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Amy Stne6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Lynch / Rhonda Williams vs Lucy Atkinson / Breckyn Jackson7-5, 6-2
2025-02-02vs BP/Crenshaw/Yancey 2025Won 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Fortenberry / Rhonda Williams vs Nicole Crenshaw / Mary Barrett Yancey6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Hassell / Susan Nixon vs Sadiqa Chiles / Mariana Zaa6-3, 6-2
2025-01-26vs BP/ChamblissSplit 11
L#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Esra Santesso2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMary Jane Hassell / Rhonda Williams vs Pamela Anderson / Rachel Cabaniss6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Business Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Claire Fortenberry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Claire Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Mary Jane Hassell
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.17
Rhonda Williams
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Claire Fortenberry
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Claire Lynch
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Mary Jane Hassell
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Rhonda Williams
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.