Teams

BC-MCC/LeasaIreland4.0

2026 SoCal Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · BC Women - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-MCC/SarahSautot4.0000000
2BC-MCC/LeasaIreland4.0000000
3BC-WestEnd/NoreenWenjen4.0000000
4BC-BJKTC/JoGarrett4.0000000
5BC-MCC/RachelAlexander4.0000000
6BC-WestEnd/MaryKayDyes4.0000000
7BC-MiraCosta/PamelaHayes4.0000000
8BC-AltaVista/TracyCostano4.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Tracy Leeds
published
3.86
Elizabeth Shelor
published
3.79
Francia Zink
published
3.78
3.77
Carrie Arsenault
published 4
3.77
Denise Towsley
published 4
3.75
Becky Anzivino
published 4
3.75
Beth Rager
published 4
3.74
Kathy Bordin
published
3.74
Heidi Nelson
published
3.73
Serene Peterson
published
3.71
Leasa Ireland
published
3.70
Kelli Spriggs
published
3.68
Kristen Finn
published
3.67
Jhoanna Torres
published
3.66
Brooke Hayes
published 4
3.65
Stephanie Ertman
published
3.64
Amanda Kresser
published 4
3.61
Bernice Lake
published 4
3.57
Aparna Voleti
published 4
3.48
Erin Freeman
published
3.45
Mojgan Vakili
published
Laura Chmiel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leasa Ireland + Kathy Bordin2354% games+1.7% vs expected
Tracy Leeds + Denise Towsley404 matchesnot enough data
Mojgan Vakili + Kathy Bordin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Leeds
96W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.92
Elizabeth Shelor
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
Francia Zink
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Anne Marie Leonard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carrie Arsenault
65W–33L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
4
Denise Towsley
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Caitlin Fredericks
13W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Becky Anzivino
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Beth Rager
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Kathy Bordin
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Heidi Nelson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Serene Peterson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Leasa Ireland
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kelli Spriggs
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Kristen Finn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Jhoanna Torres
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Brooke Hayes
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Stephanie Ertman
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Amanda Kresser
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Bernice Lake
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Aparna Voleti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Erin Freeman
23W–21L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
Mojgan Vakili
80W–39L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Laura Chmiel
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.