Teams

Louisville/Hash/Maynard

2025 USTA 70 & OVER TEAM INVITATIONAL · 3.5 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-18vs Louisville/MinihanLost 12
W#1 DoublesDebbie Russell / Billie Welker vs Janie Bean / Carol Warren6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathleen Mandlehr / Mary Kissel vs Jody Walters / Sheila Smith3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Jones / Peggy Hash vs Catherine Minihan / Mary Jean Curley3-6, 5-7
2025-05-17vs Louisville/MinihanWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Gdaniec / Billie Welker vs Tina Gilmour / Mary Jean Curley7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBonnie Carrico / Judi Bigg vs Catherine Minihan / Sheila Smith6-2, 7-5
2025-05-15vs Louisville/MinihanLost 12
W#1 DoublesBonnie Carrico / Christine Gdaniec vs Jody Walters / Janie Bean6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJudi Bigg / Kathleen Mandlehr vs Mary Jean Curley / Tina Gilmour1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Hash / Mary Kissel vs Donna Dunn / Carol Warren2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Billie Welker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bonnie Carrico
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christine Gdaniec
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Judi Bigg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Mandlehr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Kissel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peggy Hash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Billie Welker
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Bonnie Carrico
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Christine Gdaniec
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Judi Bigg
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Mandlehr
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Kissel
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Hash
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.