Teams

Oxford Smash Squad

Tri-Level · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-29vs Tennis Strikers Tri-Level 2026Won 20
W#1 DoublesJacob Braun / Aashish Jog vs Matt Wynne / Daniel Craig6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesConstantin Savtchenko / Steven Wolk vs Hermes Cordoba / Michael Marks6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Strikers Tri-Level 2026000000
2Oxford Smash Squad000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Aashish Jog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Vaughn Hunkele
published
Jacob Braun
published 4
3.27
Michael Hummel
published
3.13
Steven Wolk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Joe Bertagna
published
2.96
Joe Kelly
published
2.86
Manoj Kandlikar
published
2.81
Bapi Raju
published 3
2.81
Meng Lee
published
Constantin Savtchenko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Richard Jones
published
Steven Dachille
published
Todd Walker
published
Will Judkis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Braun + Steven Dachille314 matchesnot enough data
Todd Walker + Aashish Jog213 matchesnot enough data
Steven Wolk + Joe Kelly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aashish Jog
47W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Vaughn Hunkele
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jacob Braun
71W–28L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Hummel
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Steven Wolk
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
Joe Bertagna
57W–43L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Joe Kelly
28W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Manoj Kandlikar
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Bapi Raju
51W–35L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Meng Lee
20W–32L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Constantin Savtchenko
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Richard Jones
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven Dachille
13W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Todd Walker
17W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Will Judkis
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.